This is a noble goal and yet there are so many out there, definitions of leadership that is. This morning in my reading I have been reminded of several. I am not going to give my own definition here, but rather discuss more of the concept as I understand, knowing that there is more to it and it may not land with everyone the same.
There are soooooooo many that espouse to know what leadership is, and maybe they do. But, if you really look at each of them and their “definition” they are all similar save for the target of or result desired. In just looking at three in my reading, they all lean into persuasion and influence as a part of leadership. So the concept of leadership is to persuade and/or influence others.
This persuasion and/or influence is used to get others to do things that are wanted or desired by the one persuading and/or influencing or to reach a certain goal. And this can be done a number of ways. One can explain the positive impact of the change or reaching the goal. One can demonstrate the consequences of not achieving. And there is also the “because I said so” method. But ultimately, the idea is to get others to do that which is wanted by the one.
With this in mind, it is the goal of spiritual leadership to move others toward the goal that God has for us in our lives. The thing is that each of us is different and the goal that God has for you is certainly different than the goal He has for me. That makes the concept of persuasion and/or influence a challenge. We cannot lead to something if we do not know what that something is. And, we have to be careful in leading to our own path when those we are leading may not be interested or able to follow our path.
Here is the thing. We are to persuade and/or influence others to God’s agenda. Think about the biblical leaders. Moses, led the Israelites out of Egypt because God told Him to so that they would be established in the promised land (God’s agenda). Joshua led the Israelites to topple the walls Jericho that they would be established in the promised land (God’s agenda). Jesus, gave Himself to die for us that we would be established as saved from this world and become heirs with Him in heaven (God’s agenda).
We are to persuade and/or influence others to God’s agenda, not our own. When looked on as this, I can see that spiritual leadership is not just useful in the church. It is useful in the secular world as well. My leadership is to move others to God’s agenda and not my own or some other entity. Yes, there may be tasks to complete within the other entity, but those should be leading to the ultimate goal of aligning and completing God’s plan. Leadership therefore is moving others to accomplish God’s agenda as the statement from Henry and Richard Blackaby indicates here:
“Spiritual leadership is moving people on to God’s agenda.”
What is your definition of leadership? Are you attributing to the completion of single or defined tasks? What if you attributed everything to move others on to God’s agenda?
Trevor's Thoughts 